If there’s one thing that remains consistent about the digital marketplace, it’s that we’re always looking for new ways to make processes faster, frictionless and more efficient.
E-commerce thrives on the principle of delivering a seamless experience for customers, but there is only so much that we can handle at the merchant level. Eventually, the drive for quicker resolutions turns into a push for faster—or even instant—payments settling.
But could there be a downside to faster payments?
Transaction disputes are one potential problem. Visa CEO Al Kelly
In the U.S., the
Don’t get me wrong; innovation is a good thing. We cannot allow it to come at the expense of uncertainty and risk regarding online fraud. The ramifications of completely replacing our existing payments clearing infrastructure are hard to predict. Whenever we have major industry changes generating uncertainty, it’s usually a safe bet that fraudsters find ways to manipulate the situation before we know how to secure it against them.
Under the present state of affairs, merchants and banks are already
Instant payment settling is popular.
One recent survey
When asked if they would be willing to switch to a new acquirer who offered instant receipt funding, 85% said yes.
Why are instant payments suddenly such a commanding issue for merchants? The gig economy is one of the major factors. According to the same survey, the value of the gig economy is projected to reach $455.2 billion annually by 2023. However, the real answer is a lot more fundamental and intrinsic to the nature of the digital market. It’s a natural extension of the drive to always make online interactions a faster, pain-free experience.
The major card schemes are already working toward the goal of an instant payments settlement. Visa
The real testament to the appeal of instant payments comes not from major industry players but from the federal government. The U.S. Federal Reserve may