-
Many foreign banks are confused about how the Volcker Rule applies to them and whether they are required to establish compliance programs for it in the first place.
November 12 -
Recent remarks by European politicians and HSBC chairman Douglas Flint are indicative of a mindset that's more interested in complaining about regulations than managing risk, according to Mayra Rodriguez Valladares.
August 7 -
The Basel system has sanctioned bank balance sheets on the verge of insolvency, but in doing so it may have permitted much more lending and much more trading.
September 5 -
Just a day after the Dodd-Frank Act's fifth anniversary, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Richard Shelby launched a new attempt to make significant changes to the law, attaching his regulatory relief bill to legislation that would provide funding for financial services agencies.
July 22
The fifth anniversary of the Dodd-Frank Act has occasioned vigorous debate about whether the law has made banks safer. To my mind, it is highly fortunate that U.S. bank regulators have overcome significant opposition from some politicians and bank lobbyists to finalize key rules pertaining to banks' capital levels, resolution plans and ability to weather a crisis. These regulations should help decrease the likelihood of another round of big-bank bailouts.
However, strengthened U.S. regulations will not insulate U.S. taxpayers if banks in other countries lack the risk management and capital levels to withstand unexpected losses. U.S. banks are extremely interconnected with foreign banks, and the safety and soundness of banks abroad should be cause for serious concern.
U.S. banks are especially sensitive to risks in the United Kingdom and continental Europe. Our large banks conduct numerous transactions with European banks, and a number of U.K. and European banks have significant operations in the U.S. According to Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council
Unfortunately, U.K. and European banks' profits and safety continue to be challenged by economic
It's clear that European banks need to do a lot more work to ensure their stability. Late last year, the Basel Committee found that the European Union is not fully
Because U.S. bank regulators are members of the Basel Committee, they can voice their concerns about the safety of U.K. and European banks. But they do not have the power to examine the condition of foreign banks outside U.S. borders. The most meaningful tool available to regulators who seek to protect U.S. banks and taxpayers from the vacillations of their foreign counterparts is their ability to impose tough requirements on foreign banks with U.S. units.
Because European banks are
Of these banks, the two that should be of most concern are Deutsche Bank and HSBC. Deutsche has relied heavily on debt markets for its revenues. With low interest rates prevailing in the U.S. and Europe, it will be difficult for Deutsche to maintain profitability and remain sufficiently capitalized to sustain unexpected losses. Additionally, the bank remains in the spotlight due to
For its part, HSBC has such a long list of global money laundering, terrorism financing and rate-rigging scandals that it's hard not to find a country where it is paying numerous fines and spending millions to hire compliance officers and auditors, all in the hopes of improving its operational risk management.
Shelby's proposal would weaken U.S. bank regulators' right to impose enhanced capital, risk management, and stress-testing requirements on these and other foreign institutions. If their conditions worsen, foreign banks might dip into funds from their U.S. subsidiaries, negatively affecting the U.S. economy. Yet if the U.S. subsidiaries' capital were to weaken, there is no guarantee that European parent companies will be able to rescue their offspring.
Government funds have already been used once to
Mayra Rodríguez Valladares is managing principal at
financial regulatory consulting and training firm in New York. On Twitter, she is