With cancelled contracts, stalled work and a plan for mass layoffs, the White House has signaled an uncertain future for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The extent of the cuts that the Department of Government Efficiency will execute is
Regardless of
Since 2011, more than 8 million complaints across more than 7,000 institutions have been submitted to the CFPB portal. It has been reported that since the agency's work was halted, a backlog of thousands of complaints has accumulated instead of being forwarded to financial institutions.
Customer complaint data is a critical asset for every organization. Full of valuable information, it is far more than just a record of grievances. Customer narrative data offers actionable analytics — including granular insights into the customer complaint journey itself, as well as consumer behavior, financial institutions' accountability, and emerging risks and opportunities.
One such insight, essential in the age of AI, is apparent from analyzing the CFPB's own interface. Eighteen months ago, the agency revised its portal's customer complaint drop-downs, or prompts. Going far beyond mere semantics, those prompts reshaped how consumers express their concerns and how financial institutions interpret and respond to their complaints.
For example, previously, consumers were given a sub-issue prompt of "card opened as a result of identity theft or fraud." This was revised to "card opened without my consent or knowledge." The change raises the question of whether customers interpret these two prompts as the same thing, and how financial institutions might perceive and respond to these changes.
The Trump administration continues to battle the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's union by seeking a stay of a preliminary injunction that reinstated the CFPB's workforce and contracts and preserved its data.
The data reveals that something as seemingly innocent as a change in prompt can have massive impacts. Indeed, an unexpected shift occurred: While customers' core messages remained consistent — they want fraudulent accounts removed from their credit reports — there were notable differences in their complaint language. Financial institutions' responses to those customer complaints differed too.
Through analysis of CFPB data, it's clear that by changing their prompts, financial institutions can change customer behavior.
At a time when so many businesses are turning to artificial intelligence in the name of efficiency, this takeaway could not be more critical: The prompts an organization uses impact not only their customers' responses, but their own institution's response as well.
This is just one example of how customer complaint data collected and centralized by an organization can be tapped for tremendous insights. What customers say offers a wealth of powerful intelligence that must not be ignored.
While the work of the CFPB may evolve over the coming months and years, one thing is certain: Customers will continue to offer their feedback. That data offers countless opportunities to financial institutions to drive growth, mitigate risks and secure customer loyalty.
We must ensure that, no matter the CFPB's fate, institutions value their customer complaint data — and unpack all of its transformative potential.
