-
WASHINGTON The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. sought to ease concerns about its view of banks' affiliations with online lenders, saying institutions correctly managing their third-party relationships "are neither prohibited nor discouraged" from processing payments for legal entities.
September 27 -
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. is facing accusations that it is forcing banks to cut ties with online payday lenders, but the agency says it is only urging banks to be on guard about merchant relationships that elevate their risk.
September 20 -
State and federal regulators appear to be orchestrating a series of actions to force financial institutions and third-party payment processors to stop doing business with certain online consumer installment lenders.
August 22
In response to requests from members of Congress, and presumably banks and third-party processors, the FDIC issued a
The letter makes clear that financial institutions may facilitate payment processing services to legally compliant merchants if the institution manages the risks associated with such activities. To manage such risk, financial institutions must perform proper risk assessments, conduct due diligence sufficient to ascertain that the merchants are operating in accordance with applicable law, and maintain appropriate systems to monitor these relationships over time. Such efforts are for bankers to assure themselves that they are not facilitating fraudulent or illegal activity, and thus not exposing themselves to financial or legal risk.
I am sure that all parties involved in payment processing activities appreciate the FDIC's formal sanctioning of such processing activities for insured financial institutions that follow the letter and other regulatory guidance by implementing a proper compliance management system for the merchant relationship. The letter does not prohibit relationships with higher-risk merchants by insured financial institutions. In fact, apart from footnotes to prior FDIC pronouncements, there is no mention in the letter of any reputation risk associated with processing activities for higher-risk merchants.
Unmentioned by the letter is the FDIC's reliance on the
Although the letter specifically states that financial institutions operating with the appropriate systems and controls to oversee payment processing transactions will not be criticized during FDIC examinations, it is too early to determine the standard the FDIC will apply for a bank-level compliance management system to effectively monitor merchant relationships, including the initial due diligence performed on higher-risk merchants. I expect that banks and processors hope that the standard will be established at a level upon which reasonable minds can agree. However, I am aware of instances of FDIC personnel, all the way up to regional directors, advising banks under their supervision that they should not associate with certain businesses or else implement a CMS the scope of which would be tantamount to a prohibition of payment processing by the bank to higher-risk merchants.
The letter also leaves open the issue of how to assess whether operations by certain merchants are legal, such as the much-publicized activities of lenders. Regulators may approach complex legal issues, such as those involving
Prior to Sept. 27, the FDIC had created a two-tier system of regulation. Bankers have told me of instances in which they have cut loose a customer at the FDIC's urging only to have that party establish accounts at the money center bank down the street. Moreover, the FDIC's public approval of payment processing services to higher-risk merchants may be diluted in the examination context. Examiners may determine that the payment processing activities have a potential negative impact on reputation risk, despite steps taken by the bank to mitigate risks associated with the activities. In this context, the FDIC has appeared to apply a different standard of reputation risk than its regulatory brethren.
Despite the unanswered questions, the letter provides a foothold for banks that provide payment processing activities to higher-risk merchants, particularly when questioned about such activities in the examination context.
Peter G. Weinstock leads the Financial Institutions Corporate and Regulatory practice at Hunton & Williams LLP.