-
Medical debt may prove to be one of the complex areas that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau will tackle in its highly anticipated rulemaking on debt collection next year.
December 23 -
Tech startup Global Debt Registry hopes a central, online record of consumer debt will help end abuses in collection practices. But the byzantine world of debt collections is full of challenges.
December 29 -
Banks and other financial companies are engaging in disturbing new overdraft practices, violating fair lending laws related to mortgages and being too aggressive in how they collect student loan debt, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau said Wednesday.
March 11 -
The CFPB's lawsuit against an Atlanta-area debt collector could open the door to litigation against banks for their role in the process of pursuing debts against consumers who do not owe anything.
October 1
Debt sales are broken. Brokers, buyers and sellers offer books of debt that may be double- or triple-sold, lack documentation, or even be illegally originated.
Some tertiary and junk debt buyers, also known as shifty "
In a
An
These are just a few of the findings that will inform the CFPB's
At the moment, regulatory uncertainty has caused many financial institutions to limit debt sales, leaving many debt buyers to struggle and some to close their doors. With less debt sales and far fewer secondary sales, originators and major debt buyers find themselves with more inventory, requiring increasing investments in data and processing infrastructure to meet regulatory requirements while maintaining steady returns. With defaults at historically low levels, the situation is not yet catastrophic, although that could change.
Yet all this is worth it in order for the CFPB to put originators and debt buyers under increased scrutiny.
The fact is the industry needs stronger regulation. It is still very easy for debt collectors to start out at the state level, buy debt portfolios and start exploiting consumers. The CFPB only regulates large debt collection agencies, and state attorneys general lack the resources to regulate the small ones.
Creating a choke point upstream with the originators is the right course of action. Reducing the number of portfolios that are sold "as is" and placing more liability on banks to provide data and audit their service providers will have a positive effect on the market as a whole. For decades, originators have turned a blind eye to what happens to consumers after they sell their debt. This has aided debt collectors' unscrupulous tactics, and these practices can no longer be tolerated.
Moreover, the CFPB's new rules will require originators and debt buyers to invest in infrastructure and automation to fulfill expected data consistency and disclosure requirements. That's a good thing, since the industry has suffered from underinvestment for years.
Finally, these changes will have a measurable, positive impact on consumers. Insourcing will tie debt collection closer with the overall user experience. The required infrastructure improvements will add transparency. And much-needed investments in automation and digitization will turn an adversarial process into a more tolerable one maybe even one that's focused on retaining and rehabilitating customers.
Changes in regulation are always scary, and it's easy for incumbents to succumb to kneejerk reactions. However, upon closer examination of the effects of the CFPB's forthcoming rule, it's clear they are a step in the right direction. The sooner the debt collection industry recognizes that, the better prepared we will be. In the long term, everyone will benefit.
Ohad Samet is a co-founder and chief executive of the debt-recovery company TrueAccord. Follow him on Twitter