-
With Republicans now controlling both chambers of Congress and signals from Democrats that they are open to alterations, revisions to Dodd-Frank are at the top of the agenda in addition to other subjects, like terrorism insurance and housing finance reform.
January 5 -
The CFPBs rapid pace is likely to continue this year as it tackles some of its trickiest areas yet, including payday loans, debt collection and overdraft protection, which are likely to have a significant impact on the financial services arena.
January 2 -
Medical debt may prove to be one of the complex areas that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau will tackle in its highly anticipated rulemaking on debt collection next year.
December 23 -
The CFPB sued Sprint on Wednesday, claiming it allowed illegal charges onto customer's cell phone bills. The case is likely to be a test of whether the agency has the power to oversee telecommunications firms.
December 17
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau head Richard Cordray is building an empire. Given the vast unchecked power the Dodd-Frank Act gave the agency, why wouldn't he? The CFPB is insulated from congressional and executive oversight and has near-plenary authority. This is at odds with America's tripartite constitutional system of government and traditional institutional checks and balances.
The CFPB's expansive view of its authority should remind the incoming Republican Congress that it's high time to rein it in, if not eliminate it.
There is evidence aplenty that the CFPB has overstepped its bounds. It recently made a grab to regulate
These moves indicate that the CFPB is starting to see itself as a central planner rather than just an enforcer for consumer finance law and industry watchdog. At the
The industry is hardly against consumer protection. But without guidance from regulators, payment systems such as MasterCard and Visa have built in robust consumer protections and chargeback rights. They do this because it is in their best interests, and the interests of their licensees, to do so.
In sum, the CFPB is administrative law on steroids. Support for this argument can be drawn from
The CFPB's 253-page
There are a number of other issues with the CFPB. The agency's director can write and approve his or her own budget of
The CFPB risks suppressing innovation and choice in the financial services industry. But what is to be done about it?
Congress should act to curb the CFPB. For one thing, Congress should ensure that it, rather than the Fed, funds the agency. This would make the agency directly accountable to Congress, which is in turn politically accountable to voters. It should also eliminate the CFPB's authority to deem products "abusive" and consequently ban them, and restrict the agency's authority to traditional standards of policing unfair and deceptive practices. If all the material facts of products are fully disclosed, adults who are competent to vote, serve on juries and join the army should be free to decide whether or not to use them.
Moreover, Congress should ensure that the CFPB is supervised by a bipartisan board like other administrative agencies, rather than headed by an unaccountable director who is only removable for cause.
This can be a bipartisan effort. Some on the left, including George Washington law professor Jonathan Turley, profoundly believe in constitutional separation of powers. Some congressional Democrats still do too. They have an interest in defending Congresses' institutional authority over administrative agencies.
No matter how enlightened regulators are, it's not their job to make policy or to make consumers' choices for them. It's their job to implement and enforce the law. The CFPB should therefore have a more circumscribed role subject to rigorous, politically accountable congressional oversight.
Eric Grover is principal at Intrepid Ventures, a corporate development and strategy consultancy advising payment issuers, networks and processors, and other payments companies.