WASHINGTON — President Trump has signed the congressional measure invalidating the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s arbitration rule, killing the regulation that was unpopular with banks and other financial institutions.
The president signed H.J. Res. 111 in a closed meeting Wednesday afternoon, offering no public statement. The White House confirmed that the president signed the resolution in a statement to the White House press pool.
The rule, which the CFPB issued in July, would have prohibited financial companies from requiring consumers to forfeit their right to sue the firms in class actions as part of their use agreements. Such “mandatory arbitration” clauses — which can be found in agreements with credit card companies, payments processors and banks — steer legal disputes toward extrajudicial arbitration venues, which the CFPB argued unfairly favor the companies over the consumers.
The rule has been the source of a
More recently, Cordray
“I think you really don't like to see American families, including veterans and service members, get cheated out of their hard-earned money and be left helpless to fight back," Cordray wrote. "I know that some have made elaborate arguments to pretend like that is not what is happening. But you are a smart man, and I think we both know what is really happening here."
The House of Representatives passed a resolution under the Congressional Review Act to negate the rule in July, and the Senate voted only
Financial industry organizations praised the move.
Consumer Bankers Association President and CEO Richard Hunt said in a statement that the arbitration rule was “never about protecting consumers; rather, it was about protecting trial lawyers and their wallets.”
Independent Community Bankers of America CEO Camden Fine added that arbitration is a “well-established and tested process that offers better results for consumers” and praised the president for “swiftly signing this measure into law.”
Noreika also praised Trump’s signing of the resolution, saying in a statement that it “stops a rule that likely would have significantly increased the cost of credit for hardworking Americans and taken away a valuable tool for resolving differences among banks and their customers.”