Republicans and Democrats try — again —  to come together on stablecoins

Patrick McHenry - Maxine Waters
House Financial Services Committee ranking member Maxine Waters, D-Calif., left, and committee chair Patrick McHenry, R-N.C., have each issued bills to regulate stablecoins, and while there are important differences between the two bills, both sides indicated a desire to reach a bipartisan consensus.
Bloomberg News

WASHINGTON — House lawmakers discussed two draft versions of long-awaited stablecoin legislation during a hearing of the House Financial Services Committee's digital assets panel, a meaningful step forward toward finding a bipartisan compromise that could pass Congress this year. 

Ahead of the hearing, House Financial Services Committee ranking member Maxine Waters, D-Calif., released the Democratic version of a stablecoin bill that has striking similarities to the version offered by panel chairman Rep. Patrick McHenry, R-N.C., earlier this year, including a nearly identical definition of digital assets. While the House could pass McHenry's bill, they will need bipartisan buy-in to get the bill through the Democratic-controlled Senate. 

Lawmakers from both parties expressed a desire to craft a bipartisan bill, though some clear divisions remained. 

Waters' bill features a new section that would bar the commingling of customer funds with assets held by a stablecoin issuer — a clear reference to the turmoil caused by complicated intermingling of funds in the collapse of crypto exchange FTX. The bill would also give the Federal Reserve the option to deny any registration of a state-approved stablecoin issuer, which Waters said would ensure a strong federal floor for stablecoin registration, and ensure that stablecoin issuers couldn't engage in regulatory arbitrage. 

The Republican version, meanwhile, emphasizes state governments' role in overseeing stablecoins.

Rep. French Hill, R-Ark., the chairman of the subcommittee on digital assets, said that Republicans considered the Biden administration's studies on digital assets in their version of the bill, and sought to find similarities between the McHenry and Waters drafts. 

"I remain convinced that members on both sides of the aisle are actively working in good faith to find agreement on these key points. We also agree on the basic protections that must be included in any stablecoin legislation. Consumer, investor protection is at the heart of our bill," he said. "So, I want to be clear that while we noticed two different legislative proposals today, we are not starting from scratch. To do so would have ignored all the effort that was made and common ground that was found during the negotiations on the previous proposal." 

For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
Politics and policy Cryptocurrency Regulation and compliance
MORE FROM AMERICAN BANKER