Powell: CFPB shutdown creates consumer oversight gaps

Jerome Powell
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell
Bloomberg News

With the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau sidelined, there is no federal regulator examining large banks for consumer compliance, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell told lawmakers on Tuesday, and banking agencies can only do so much to pick up the slack.

Powell said the Fed can still enforce antidiscrimination and consumer protection laws against all the entities it supervises — banking holding companies and state-chartered banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System — but it only has examination teams for banks with less than $10 billion of assets. 

Banks above that limit are, at the federal level, the sole responsibility of the CFPB, he said. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, which created the agency, and gave the bureau consolidated oversight authority over large banks as well as non-bank financial institutions.

"We do have some residual enforcement authorities," Powell said, "But what we don't have is examination authority for the banks that the CFPB supervises." 

The discussion came during Powell's testimony in front of the Senate Banking Committee, the first of two appearances on Capitol Hill for the Fed chair this week, as part of his semi-annual report to Congress on monetary policy.

Throughout the two-and-a-half-hour hearing, Powell was asked various questions about consumer protection as well as its role in funding the CFPB, which was effectively shuttered by newly-appointed Acting Director Russell Vought.

Within 24 hours of being placed at the helm last Friday, Vought directed all CFPB employees to stop work entirely. He also requested that the agency's funding be slashed to zero and closed its headquarters in Washington. The moves were billed as a temporary shutdown to assess the CFPB's policies and practices, but they have raised concerns about the administration's intentions for the agency.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., the committee's ranking member and a key architect of the CFPB before joining Congress, said the shutdown amounted to telling police officers to stop enforcing laws.

"The CFPB is our law enforcement agency to make sure that the giant banks follow the rules on consumer protection," Warren said. "For me, right now, I'd be really worried about doing business with a giant bank when there's no cop on the beat."

Powell also responded to questions about the Fed's funding of the CFPB, a structure that was also established by Dodd-Frank. Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., asked whether the Fed could legally bankroll the bureau when the central bank was, itself, running at a net operating loss. 

The Fed, which funds itself through its open market operations associated with its balance sheet, has not been profitable since it began raising interest rates and shrinking its balance sheet in 2022. 

"There are only two statutes that require the Fed to make Fed bank assessments and neither permit the CFPB to fund transfers," Britt said. "So what authority, exactly, did the federal reserve have to assess the reserve banks in this manner over the last two years?"

Powell said the Fed has looked into this very question and confirmed that not only can it continue funding the CFPB, but it must.

"We looked at that question very carefully, and it's very clear on the law and the legislative history that we're still required to make those payments," Powell said. 

Stress testing

During the hearing, Powell outlined the changes the Fed intends to make to its stress testing regime later this year. 

The central bank announced in late December that it would adjust its methods to make the annual exams more transparent and less prone to dramatic year-to-year changes. On Tuesday, Powell previewed what those reforms might be.

"On transparency, we're going to release the models, clean them up and publish the models, put them out for comments," he said. "We're also going to release the stress test scenarios before we implement them."

To reduce volatility, the Fed will no longer base each examined bank's stress capital buffer on the results of a single year's projected losses. Instead, it will take the outcome of each exam and incorporate it into a multi-year average.

"The problem is the stress capital buffer will be moving up and down just because of volatility in the results," he said. "It seems like a good idea to smooth that out by averaging over a couple of years."

Powell noted that because the Fed will be conducting a notice-and-comment process on these changes, the exact policy reforms could be subject to change.

Capital reform

In the waning moments of the hearing, Powell shared how the Fed is thinking about the so-called Basel III endgame, the capital reform effort that elicited strong pushback from the banking industry and derailed the Biden-era bank regulatory agenda. 

Powell said the Fed intends to finalize a capital rule that aligns the U.S. with other countries involved in the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, but in a way that results in minimal capital increases for banks. 

"My own view has been that our banks are well-capitalized," he said. "Basel III was not supposed to be an exercise in raising capital in U.S. banks. [Former European Central Bank President] Mario Draghi said that, [Former Fed Gov.] Dan Tarullo said that back in the day, I believe, so I think that's about right." 

Powell said he was "eager" to work with new leadership at the FDIC and OCC to finalize the Basel endgame reforms. He said work remains to be done on the issue, but he expects it to be completed "fairly quickly."

A lighter touch

 

Another theme of the hearing was the closure of consumer accounts due to regulatory concerns, a concept known as "debanking."

Powell said on multiple occasions that he is concerned about the large volume of reported debanking incidents and that he is committed to taking a "fresh look" at the factors that might contribute to this trend. 

"We hear a lot of people talk about it and it's time to take a fresh look, I think," he said. "We don't intentionally do these things, but sometimes regulation leads things to happen, and we need to be working on that."

This was not the only unintended consequence on the Fed chairman's mind on Tuesday. Powell also noted that it was important that regulation not incentivize consolidation in the banking sector. 

"We've seen the number of community banks declining for 30 years. We don't want to be the cause of that," he said. "If it's happening by natural causes or evolving technology, that's one thing, but we don't want to be inadvertently causing that to happen."

For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
Regulation and compliance Consumer banking Politics and policy
MORE FROM AMERICAN BANKER