Judge narrows scope of discovery in Custodia lawsuit against Fed

Federal Reserve 033023
A judge denied a discovery motion by digital asset bank Custodia this week for additional information from the Federal Reserve about other banks' master account approval processes in a case that could have broad implications for how the Fed admits or denies applicants' access to the Federal Reserve system.
Bloomberg News

The federal judge overseeing Custodia Bank's lawsuit against the Federal Reserve narrowed the scope of discovery in the case this week.

Judge Kelly Rankin, a magistrate in the U.S. District Court in Wyoming, denied the digital asset bank's request for information about applications other banks submitted to the central bank, according to a court order released on Monday.

Custodia filed suit against the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City last summer over its application for a so-called master account. The request, which languished for months at the reserve bank, was denied earlier this year. The Cheyenne, Wyoming-based bank argues that it meets the legal criteria for such an account — which imbues access to the Fed's payments system — and therefore its denial was unlawful.

The scope of discovery, the process through which parties must disclose key information related to a legal proceeding, has been a critical issue in the case, with Custodia originally pushing for a broad array of information and the Fed arguing that such lengthy disclosures could have "potential ramifications for the careful balance Congress has created with the Federal Reserve System — including potential consequences far beyond this case."

Ultimately, the court sided with the Fed and ruled it would only have to provide an administrative record summarizing the actions it took to reach its conclusion about Custodia's application. The judge overseeing the matter called Custodia's requests "borderline nonsensical."

Despite that ruling, issued last December, Custodia had continued to seek "various documents" from the Fed and third-party groups "regarding other bank's master account applications," according to a brief summary of Rankin's ruling, which was released Monday. It is unclear what precise information the bank was seeking. The subject was discussed in a private telephone conference between the two parties and Rankin, a court official said Thursday. 

The Fed argued that the information sought was "overbroad and irrelevant." Rankin sided with them, determining that the request was "outside the scope of discovery at this stage of the litigation."

Both the Fed and Custodia declined to discuss the specifics of the request this week. A representative from Rankin's office said the terms discussed in the discovery hearing were private to the two parties.

The Fed Board of Governors is due to submit its administrative record by August 21. The Kansas City Fed, which oversees the Federal Reserve System's 10th District, has already provided its discovery documents to Custodia.

Nathan Miller, a spokesman for Custodia, said this week's ruling will not impact the bank's legal challenge, noting that the bulk of the discovery process is either complete or underway. He added that one of the judges overseeing the case, Scott Skavdahl, had previously endorsed the importance of discovery in the case to determine "whether the Board of Governors was pulling the puppet strings behind the scenes," a nod to Custodia's argument that the Washington-based board might have overstepped its bounds by delaying the Kansas City Fed's action on Custodia's application.

Miller said the case, which is set to go to trial next spring, will have implications for other lawsuits that have been brought against the Fed on similar grounds. Idaho-based PayServices Bank filed suit against the San Francisco Fed in June and Puerto Rico-based Banco San Juan Internacional sued the New York Fed in July. Both depositories are arguing that they are entitled to master accounts under provisions of the Monetary Control Act of 1980.

"Three separate lawsuits are now pending against the Fed on the same statutory question — whether the Fed 'shall' provide services to all eligible depository institutions, as the statute requires," Miller said. "The answer to that statutory question is now firmly in the hands of the federal court system."

For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
Politics and policy Regulation and compliance Litigation
MORE FROM AMERICAN BANKER