GSEs Get High Marks for Risk-Sharing Deals

WASHINGTON — While Congress has been unable to pass housing finance reform, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have done a good job of adhering to some of the spirit of recent bipartisan legislation, according to Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics.

Speaking at a Ginnie Mae conference on Monday, Zandi said he was "disappointed" when the Senate failed last year to pass a reform bill from Sens. Tim Johnson, D-S.D., and Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, that have would unwound the government-sponsored enterprises and created a new system.

However, the Federal Housing Finance Agency is "effectively moving the GSEs in the direction Johnson-Crapo would have taken," especially in terms of risk-sharing deals and bringing private capital into the mortgage market, Zandi said.

Fannie and Freddie have been issuing mortgage-backed securities where private investors share in the credit risk under directives by the FHFA.

"This was a better approach than the legislation," Zandi said, because the GSEs were allowed to let the "process unfold and experiment" with different risk-sharing structures.

"They have done a surprisingly good job on that front," Zandi said.

Although a new administration could take a different approach in the future, he expects it will become a permanent structure in the housing market going forward.

"The ship has left the port and it would be pretty hard to turn it around," Zandi said.

For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
Law and regulation Consumer banking Mortgages GSEs
MORE FROM AMERICAN BANKER