One of the
Federal Reserve Board Gov. Michelle Bowman, in prepared remarks delivered Wednesday morning at a virtual event sponsored by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, emphasized her reservations about the jointly proposed reforms, but said a
"As I consider next steps, I am cautiously optimistic that policymakers can work toward a reasonable compromise, one that addresses two of the most critical shortcomings of the proposal: Over-calibration and the lack of regulatory tailoring," Bowman said. "Public feedback has also assisted in identifying the aspects of the proposal that result in the most severe unintended consequences. In my mind, it will be necessary for policymakers to modify the proposal to mitigate these issues and concerns as we move forward."
Bowman has been the
Her latest remarks came just one day after
During a question and answer session following her speech, Bowman noted that regulators have "a lot of work ahead of us" to sift through the various comments and will factor those into any changes made to the proposed rule before it is finalized.
"One of the important parts of the proposal and the comment period is understanding more about the indirect costs," she said. "I think it's most effective to understand directly from the financial institutions that are subject to the rule so that they will be the ones making decisions about product costs and availability. … We have an obligation as policymakers to understand and assess the true cost of reform."
Bowman argued that the rule as currently structured cuts against the stated goal of creating more uniform standards for regulating banks globally. She pointed to the
She also highlighted industry concerns about the framework, noting
"Diversification in revenue streams can enhance the stability and resilience of a financial institution, and excessive capital charges for these revenue-generating activities could create incentives for banks to roll back the progress they have made to diversify revenues," she said. "Basel capital reforms should not penalize non-interest and fee-based income through the proposed operational risk requirements."
Bowman also flagged the treatment of market risks as an area that "warrants attention," arguing that the proposed framework could result in higher hedging prices for farmers, manufacturers and other commodity price-sensitive businesses.
Tuesday also marked the end of the
Bowman said the
Unlike Gov. Christopher Waller, who joined her in voting against issuing the Basel III endgame proposal over the summer, Bowman stopped short of
"Based on the information available, increasing capital requirements as initially proposed could result in significant harm to the U.S. economy through the impact on U.S. businesses, while failing to achieve the intended goals of improving safety and soundness and promoting financial stability," she said.