Readers react to the Trump administration's release of a housing finance reform plan, a proposal by HUD to redefine "disparate impact" and a challenger bank's claim that it can end bank fees for good.
"With a few exceptions, this seems to be more a rehash of ideas and options than a road map."
Related:
"A historical piece that looks to focus all the GSE’s back to their intended purpose. I hope there are 'no sudden movements.' I agree FHA and the Enterprises should have less overlap. It also seems like government backed equity stripping cash out refi days are numbered. What happens when they start asking multifamily loans to amortize again?"
Related:
"I've said it before — when is one of these challenger banks going to have to prove they can turn a profit? I'll tell you what doesn't make mathematical sense - free accounts, free overdrafts and free short term loans when you hit $10B in assets. At some point you can't continue to fund growth with VC — then what will you do?"
Related:
"The author misses a few other things that banks tend to do well — and that the over-hyped blockchain doesn't — including assessing and taking credit and interest rate risk. He also incorrectly states that banks make money from high interest rates. They make money from a positively sloped yield curve."
Related:
"Reining in disparate impact is not a rollback of progress. That 'progress' was simply bankers not pushing back on a constitutionally flawed concept out of fear of being called racist ... The assault here is on due process, using flawed comparators to support an allegation."
Related:
"Every family needs shelter and the ideal would be to live in thriving communities free of discrimination but since we live in a flawed world with flawed people, having this for 100% of the people is not plausible. Home ownership is not for everyone nor should it be expected."
Related:
"The author obviously has never experienced a fair lending exam. If there's been any rollback, no one has told the bank examiners."
Related:
"Seems to me one would require integrated scenario analysis of the entire balance sheet. In theory, the diversification effect of the insurance portfolio should offset some of the balance sheet risk of the bank and vice versa. Could this result in reduced reserves?"
Related: