Readers react to a regulator's promise to reduce regulation that hinders innovation, Sen. Elizabeth Warren's plan to impose heavier taxes on lobby groups, Freddie Mac's exploration into AI and more.
"Litigation threats are destroying innovation that could be realized. The sooner the better. Banks need it."
Related:
"Another example of missing the forest for the trees. If you really want to make a difference in the political influence realm, time to look at campaign finance reform."
Related:
"Forgive me for thinking, Senator, that your true concern is that those lobbyists might be successful at occasionally thwarting some of the wildly irresponsible policies you constantly spin up."
Related:
"If this is a serious proposal, how would the CU [credit union] lobbyist fare under the rule?"
Related:
"What nonsense. ... We made loans to people with a history of not making their payments and guess what, they didn't make their payments."
Related:
"Former career OCC examiner here. I agree with everything Ms. Kennedy said, except for one thing. ... With proper training and preparation, analyzing data and delivering bad news is easy. ... Having to deal with the bad news is the hard part."
Related:
"FDIC plans an 'in-depth review' that will last another six months for a tiny bank failure? Since we already know the cause (an old formula), this is nothing more than a make-work project for a bunch of bureaucrats with nothing else to do."
Related:
“At the end of the day, if customers can transact online, you have to give them another reason to interact with your great people otherwise your best asset is underutilized."
Related:
"It is heartening that credit unions and banks and their regulators are continuing to explore ways to bring small-dollar lending to consumers who desperately need it. Bill Isaac, former Chairman FDIC."
Related: