Readers react to whether the next presidential debate will discuss banking, how California's financial policies are bleeding into other blue states, suggested reforms to the Community Reinvestment Act and more.
"Let's play a drinking game. Do a shot every time banking is spoken about in the next Dem debate. Prediction: A very sober evening."
Related:
"The road to hell is paved with good intentions. In California's case you can add 'economic ignorance'."
Related:
“Be careful what you wish for . . . Without context, CRA will be a one-size-fits-all regimen for which there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”
Related:
"CRA should be expanded to include providing credit for opportunity zones for my pals and loans for high-end condos, golf courses for me and my family."
Related:
"Perhaps when we succeed in abolishing all gender distinctions, these egregious gaps will cease to exist, and those who bravely battle the perceived injustice can rest at last."
Related:
"First, the net worth sweep is still in effect. Second, every cent of supposed retained earnings is to be offset by a debt of the same amount. If the two were paired, it would show no increase in retained earnings."
Related:
"It is not complicated. Today, most selling banks are heavily owned by private equity. If private equity thinks the currency of a potential buyer is better in the long run, there will be a sale."
Related: