Readers react to an argument that credit unions are being unfairly attacked, weigh in on trends in enforcement, reflect on the need for worker diversity programs and more.

"That was precisely the purpose of the change in the law. In fact, the original version of the legislative language would have placed a sitting state banking commissioner of the FDIC Board."
Related:

"Why not just tax all credit unions that have grown beyond around say $1 Billion to $5 Billion or forcibly convert them from a tax-free structure. To fix this should be easy-peasy lemon squeezy."
Related:

"Part of the problem with your entire argument is that you give the public the impression that credit unions don't make money (non-profit). That's simply an industry tag-line. Facts are facts. If you look at N.I.M. comparisons, credit unions have very similar N.I.M.'s. The field of membership is the biggest sham and the NCUA's lack of enforcement and oversight has made them the laughing stock of the industry. Act like a bank, get taxed and regulated like one."
Related:

"Facebook users generally know that they're giving their data to Facebook in exchange for using the Facebook platform. Unlike bank clients who just want their data to be used to process and service their accounts and don't want their data to go anywhere. The comment, '....customers should know how and why their data is being shared, with an understanding of how it benefits them and the ability to opt in or out.' is a tall order and rife with compliance/privacy challenges."
Related:

"It's not rocket science. Bring back the 2 year management training programs so common at Wall Street firms and Banks in the 80's. If Corbat were serious he could also instruct each of the bank's 18-person operating committee (as well as ask each board member) to mentor one or more diverse candidates and have them shadow the executives for 18 months or so."
Related:

"Perhaps the banking bill actually did as it was intended to do - sweep away some of the ineffective and perfunctory regulations that consumed bankers and regulators alike so that both groups could actually focus on making the system safer. The devil is in the details of those enforcement actions, but if the threats therein are real and the regulatory concern is warranted, then we should all applaud. None of us wants to go through 2008 - 2011 again."
Related:

"How about a return to teaching financial literacy in schools to start? Bank customers don't often read the disclosures and other materials they receive from their banks and don't even know how their account fees are assessed? The same analogy can be be said about loans, cable tv, and another other service a consumer uses but doesn't understand the product/service because they didn't read all the literature provided."
Related: