Readers react to trends in public banking, weigh potential changes for brokered deposits, consider oversight of foreign banks and more.
"Banks controlled by politicians. What could go wrong?"
Related:
"Very much looking forward to the FDIC's promised overall review of its brokered deposit rules and policies. They are woefully out of date. This will give us the opportunity to respond, with specifics, as to how and why those policies are out of sync with the way that customers want to interact with their banks today."
Related:
"This is a great discussion, and thanks Bill for kicking it off. But maybe there is a middle ground here? It’s not a black/white issue as in no brokered deposits vs let’s go crazy with them. Banks need the flexibility to use brokered funds to make good loans. The industry’s arguments for a change in the FDIC’s rate caps makes a lot of sense to me."
Related:
"This is exactly the opposite shift from what the White House released last June. The proposed changes included ending the conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, reducing their role in the housing market, and providing an explicit, limited Federal backstop that is on-budget and apart from the Federal support for low- and moderate-income homebuyers."
Related:
"Looking for where Comptroller Otting promised 'light supervision.' Efficient supervision (which is good and desirable) does not mean light. I like to get my car serviced where the work is done efficiently and well, and those two can often go together."
Related:
"Why stop at the top 100 managers? What about the top 500 or 1,000 managers? Wells has over 260,000 employees. And if you're a manager of a WF business unit that wasn't involved in any bad behavior, well, rotten luck."
Related: