Readers respond to an FTC settlement with SoFi, weigh calls to simplify Wells Fargo, consider crypto's revolving door and more.
"[The author] is certainly correct in citing the options available under the law; however the conclusion that divesting Wells Fargo's nonbanking activities would somehow "allow Wells Fargo to focus on fixing its persistent problems" seems a stretch. The bank has made numerous changes and no doubt many more are both needed and many more will happen, but in the end, the regulators are most interested in having a healthy financial institution. Focus isn't the problem. Execution is the challenge."
Related:
"Wells Fargo has an enormous amount of hubris and sometimes the tail wags the regulatory dog. They should be taken down a peg. However, calling for the head of the country's third largest bank is the kind of knee jerk reaction that is not needed. This is not Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. Sadly, this blind fury position is too often held amongst liberal community activists. Hopefully sounder heads will prevail and the baby will not be thrown out (in protest) with the bath water."
Related:
"A toothless police dog in action. No civil money penalty for 'deceptive' ads!?!. And where is the CFPB and state regulators in all this? I hope the FDIC paying attention."
Related:
"Where can we place our bets on plastic cards still being here in 5 years? I'm all in. Heck, make it 10 years. There are lots of folks out there with solutions in search of problems. The incredible majority of customers are absolutely happy with how their plastic cards work. Many, I'd also wager, will be extremely hesitant to rely entirely on their phones for payments."
Related:
"Spoiler alert - fast forward a couple years to the likely class action lawsuits in this sector and you'll see why several of these folks were wise enough to take on the role of 'advisor' as opposed to 'director'."
Related:
"While I think movement to a real-time payments system is really swell, I am at a bit of a loss to understand how it will address wealth inequality in our society. Income will remain the same, while delivery of payroll will happen more quickly. Great. But absent a change in compensation, or a reduction in liabilities, the same amount will simply be expended at greater velocity. If the individual's income does not cover their monthly expenses, they'll still be short. Just more quickly."
Related: