U.S. Sens. Sherrod Brown and Patrick Toomey have asked Sam Bankman-Fried to testify at a hearing on Dec. 14 about the cryptocurrency exchange FTX's collapse, according to
Brown, who is the chair of the Senate Banking Committee, said he and Toomey are prepared to issue a subpoena if the disgraced crypto founder doesn't choose to appear voluntarily.
Brown wrote that Bankman-Fried "must answer" for the failures of FTX Trading Ltd. and of Alameda Research, two of the entities in the sprawling and now-bankrupt FTX universe. "There are still significant unanswered questions about how client funds were misappropriated, how clients were blocked from withdrawing their own money, and how you orchestrated a cover up," he wrote.
Bankman-Fried had previously suggested that he would be willing to appear in front of a different committee — House Financial Services — after he'd finished "learning and reviewing."
In response, Maxine Waters, chairwoman of the House Financial Services Committee, told Bankman-Fried that it was "
By Wednesday night, Rep. Waters' rhetoric had hardened further. "A subpoena is definitely on the table. Stay tuned,"
The letter from Sen. Brown and the comments from Rep. Waters come during a week in which Bankman-Fried, who resigned from FTX in early November, has continued his post-bankruptcy tour of podcasts and interviews against the advice of various lawyers.
In a Twitter Spaces held on Tuesday, participants grilled him on how exactly things went south at FTX so quickly, and what happened with users' funds on the exchange. By the end of the interview, Bankman-Fried had taken on a combative stance toward the people asking questions.
That same day, Bankman-Fried's representative Mark Botnick confirmed that the embattled CEO had
While Bankman-Fried has not been charged with any crimes, he is facing
Botnick, Bankman-Fried's representative, declined to comment beyond a statement previously provided to The New York Times and attributable to the former FTX executive: "I am not aware of any market manipulation and certainly never intended to engage in market manipulation. To the best of my knowledge, all transactions were for investment or for hedging.