-
The central bank is floating the concept of using the Internet to facilitate the direct clearing of transactions between financial institutions, which would likely diminish its own role in the U.S. payment system.
February 11 -
Banks would have to upgrade their systems to accommodate faster transactions, and originating banks would pay the receiving financial institutions a fee to cover those costs, under a plan from Nacha, the industry group that sets ACH rules.
December 9 -
If checks, a payment method that's hundreds of years old, can be updated for the Internet age, why can't America's four-decade-old electronic payments system? It's not for lack of trying.
November 13 -
In a new detailed report, the Federal Reserve laid out four options for upgrading the creaky U.S. payment system. The study raised questions about how far the Fed can, and should, go to bring about change.
January 26 -
Earlier opposition to the idea appears to have eased in the wake of a new proposal that would use interbank fees to cover the cost of technological upgrades.
December 10
When it comes to same-day payments, everyone's a critic.
Big banks in 2012
Nacha's
The Fed has given the proposed interbank fee a more lukewarm reception. Its
It also flags Nacha's approach to setting the appropriate fee, suggesting that determining the fee based in part on "opportunity costs" and a "risk-adjusted fair rate of return" could wind up inflating the price of what has traditionally been a low-cost service. Lastly, the Fed points out that the added costs of a fee would make people and businesses less likely to use same-day ACH, thereby rendering the option less effective.
These concerns rankled a major banking trade group, which suggested that the Fed is sticking its nose where it does not belong.
"It's very troubling that the Fed is intervening into a private-sector pricing issue," said Stephen Kenneally, vice president of payments and cybersecurity policy at the American Bankers Association. "It's not the role of the Fed to set price caps. It's a big concern for the success of this Nacha proposal and an even bigger ongoing concern as we move down the road to other faster payments initiatives."
Other members of the industry had a more tempered reaction to the board's letter.
"I don't think they're trying to be interventionist, but I do think they're trying to be proactive," said Beth Robertson, a payments industry consultant. "They're not withdrawing their support for same-day ACH."
That interpretation was shared by Dave Fortney, senior vice president for product development and management at big-bank trade group and payments company The Clearing House. The group is one of two ACH operators in the country, along with the Fed, and it announced last fall a separate plan to
"These are good questions the Fed's asking," Fortney said. "But they are not posed in ways that are objections to the industry moving forward, provided the input from all stakeholders is received and duly considered and debated within Nacha's membership."
Nacha's plans to let its members cast a final vote on the plan in the second quarter remain unchanged, according to the organization's president and chief executive, Jan Estep. She noted that the group will take all 200 responses to its proposal into account.
"This is a complex issue and will require thoughtful consideration of all responses, but it needs to move forward," Estep said in an email.
The big question is how Nacha will respond to the Fed's suggestions.
"Nacha is in a difficult position," Kenneally said. "If they were to accede to the board's letter, they run the risk of their proposal losing support among their financial institution members. And if they alter the fee structure, that takes months or yearsit pushes back same-day ACH for a long, long time."
Banks will have to recover the costs of implementing changes to their systems one way or another, according to Cary Whaley, vice president of payments and technology policy for the Independent Community Bankers of America. He said that charging extra for same-day ACH would be a transparent way for banks to signal the true cost of the service.
"From a consumer standpoint, you want to be able to know what the cost of the transaction is up front," he said. The less desirable option would be for banks to recover costs through surcharges such as higher monthly fees, he said.
Moreover, customers are generally willing to pay a higher cost in exchange for expediency, Whaley said, pointing out that people are happy to plunk down more money for same-day shipping. "I think the demand for faster payments is clearly out there," he said.
But banks do not necessarily have to pass the costs on to all originators, according to payments technology expert Dave Birch. "In the U.K., the banks provide service free to retail customers (I think it costs them a few cents per transfer) but charge businesses," he wrote in an email.
In response to the Fed's recommendation that Nacha ask for feedback from the parties who would originate same-day payments, the group noted that it has been soliciting input from businesses and consumer groups for the past two years, including through a
The group's proposal for same-day ACH has prompted supportive comments from the