Receiving Wide Coverage ...
Disputed data: President Trump now has more than enough reason to fire Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Director Richard Cordray following a Treasury Department report that says the CFPB’s recent rule prohibiting mandatory arbitration agreements doesn’t benefit consumers so much as “Mr. Cordray’s trial lawyer pals,” the Wall Street Journal’s editorial board says.
According to Treasury, a study the CFPB conducted in 2015, “only 13% of class actions that the CFPB studied resulted in a recovery for members,” the paper said. “In the average case, plaintiffs received $32 while attorneys hauled in more than $1 million.”
“The CFPB’s oversights are so many and so egregious that they suggest intent more than negligence, and the Treasury report provides ample evidence that the rule is arbitrary and capricious, which would make it illegal,” the editors conclude. “It also gives the President all the more reason to replace Mr. Cordray.”
“The bureau failed to meaningfully evaluate whether prohibiting mandatory arbitration clauses in consumer financial contracts would serve either consumer protection or the public interest,” the Treasury report said.
The Washington Post said it was “highly unusual” for the Trump administration to “attack a rule proposed by one of its own agencies.”
“It is not unusual for such regulators to disagree, but rarely do those squabbles spill out into public view,” it said.
FX trader convicted: A federal jury in Brooklyn found Mark Johnson, HSBC’s former global head of foreign-exchange cash trading, guilty of misusing information about a client’s $3.5 billion currency trade to make millions for the bank. Johnson was the first banker to face criminal charges following a Justice Department investigation into forex rate manipulation.

One of Johnson’s lawyers said he planned to appeal, adding, “Today an innocent man was convicted.”
Wall Street Journal
Insurance deal: Hartford Financial Services Group agreed to
Financial Times
A woman’s touch: Diversity isn’t just the right thing to do, it’s also good for business, especially in banking, Simon Samuels, a banking consultant at Veritum Partners, writes in an op-ed piece. Yet bankers don’t seem to realize this, or are at least slow to put it into practice.
“Putting aside the wider benefits of gender diversity, there is clear evidence that it
“There is also academic evidence suggesting gender diversity improves risk management,” he adds. “So embracing diversity in the risk functions of banks may also help them avoid some of the traps that alpha male risk managers tend to fall into.”
Quotable
“I just don't believe in this bitcoin thing. I think it's just