-
Only 32% of JPMorgan Chase shareholders voted in favor of splitting Jamie Dimon's chairman and chief executive roles, but the victory can't erase the months of harsh scrutiny over Dimon's power and the bank's governance.
May 21 -
Whatever the outcome of Tuesday's vote over Jamie Dimon's dual titles at JPMorgan Chase, the debate raging at the country's largest bank will increase the pressure on bank boards to split up chairman/CEO roles in the future.
May 17 -
California accused JPMorgan of illegal tactics to sue thousands of credit card borrowers behind on their debts, including "robo-signing."
May 9
Now that Jamie Dimon
After months of criticism and
JPMorgan Chase is facing mounting regulatory scrutiny across several of its businesses, and its board now has to resolve concerns over the composition of crucial committees and the relatively thin list of people who could eventually replace Dimon. Here are the bank's next big three hurdles:
1) Resolve Regulators' Many Concerns
Dimon has spent a year trying to convince investors and lawmakers to move past the $6 billion trading loss in JPMorgan's London offices; now regulators are turning their focus to other parts of the bank. This month, California Attorney General Kamala Harris
Last month, officials from the OCC and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York told Dimon and some of his directors and executives that they don't trust management, the Wall Street Journal
On Tuesday, Dimon tersely acknowledged the regulatory shadows continuing to hang over the bank, telling shareholders that "unfortunately we may have some more" regulatory actions.
2) Rethink Board Committees
The prominent proxy advisors who called for shareholders to strip Dimon of his chairman's title also raised concerns about the qualifications of some of JPMorgan Chase's other directors, especially those on its risk management committee. Glass Lewis & Co. and Institutional Shareholder Services recommended that shareholders vote against re-electing three of the four members of that committee: David M. Cote, CEO of Honeywell International Inc.; James S. Crown, president of Henry Crown & Co.; and Ellen V. Futter, president of the American Museum of Natural History in New York.
Shareholders grudgingly re-elected all three directors, but none received more than 60% support; Futter, who was elected by only 53% of investors, did not even appear at the meeting. Lead director Lee Raymond simultaneously defended the risk committee's members and signaled that the board is rethinking their roles. He called Cote, Crown and Futter "all qualified," before telling shareholders to "stay tuned" for changes in the committee's composition.
3) Plan for the Post-Dimon Era
In the weeks leading up to the annual meeting, Dimon's lack of a clearly designated successor became an argument both for and against taking away one of his titles. (Dimon reportedly threatened to quit if he lost the nonbinding vote, thus sending shareholders and observers into a tizzy over who could replicate his reliable quarterly profits.) JPMorgan Chase has
Dimon
"We intend to have a competent and capable successor to Jamie but I hope that time is much into the future," Raymond said. "I have no illusions that we will be able to clone Jamie."